BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Mary Scot, v Mary Sharp and her Husband. [1759] Mor 440 (8 March 1759)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1759/Mor0100440-073.html Cite as:
[1759] Mor 440
Subject_1 ALIMENT. Subject_2 ALIMENT due ex debito naturali.
Mary Scot, v. Mary Sharp and her Husband
Date: 8 March 1759 Case No. No 73.
A daughter who was executrix and universal legatar to her mother, found liable to aliment her sister-uterine, who was destitute of any fund of subsistence.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Mary Scot brought an action against Mary Sharp and James Lumisden of Ranniehill, her husband, for an aliment, founded upon the following grounds:
That she was the only daughter of Lady Mary Sharp, by her first husband Mr Scot of Haychester: That Lady Mary was again married to Sir James Sharp, by whom she had a son, who predeceased her and the defender Mary Sharp: That Lady Mary, after the death of her son, executed a will, by which she appointed Mary Sharp her sole executor and universal legatar; and to that will she subjoined these words: ‘I recommend Mary Scot to her charity.’
That Mary Sharp, upon Lady Mary's death, received considerable effects by virtue of this will: That Lady Mary, while she lived, was under a natural obligation to aliment the pursuer, her only surviving child of her first marriage, who had no other means of support: That she had accordingly, while she lived, allowed her an aliment of L. 20 Sterling a-year: That Mary Sharp, as sole executor of her mother, became subject, in her place, to the same obligation; which was also strengthened by the condition annexed to the will, recommending Mary Scot to her charity.
It was answered, That Mary Sharp received very little benefit from her mother's succession; for that the debts due by Lady Mary had exhausted almost the whole of her effects: That, at any rate, as the defender was not bound to aliment her sister upon the footing of relation, so she was not bound to aliment her as representing their common mother; for that the obligation to aliment does not affect the disponees or legatees of a defunct: And the clause subjoined to the will was no more than a simple recommendation, which was not obligatory; and if it was, could never import an obligation to pay an yearly allowance.
It appeared by a proof, That Mary Sharp had received, in consequence of her mother's will, after all deductions, above L. 230 Sterling clear, which she had possessed since the year 1754, when Lady Mary died.
‘The Lords found Mary Scot entitled to an aliment of L. 12 Sterling yearly, to commence from the date of the process.’
Act. Nairn, Wedderburn, Johnstone, Ferguson.Alt. Duncnn, J. Craigie, Lockhart.Clerk, Kirkpatrick.
Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 24. Fac. Col. No 183. p. 326.
