BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Scot v Grahamand Others. [1769] Mor 15220 (30 November 1769) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1769/Mor3515220-086.html Cite as: [1769] Mor 15220 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1769] Mor 15220
Subject_1 TACK.
Subject_2 SECT. IV. In what Cases good against Singular Successors?
Date: Scot
v.
Grahamand Others
30 November 1769
Case No.No. 86.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Certain tacks, granted by John Rae of Castlebank, to commence after the expiry of the leases subsisting at the time, were found reducible, at the instance of his real creditors, in respect the creditors were “infeft in the lands let before the tenants obtained possession thereof, in virtue of those tacks.”
It was pleaded for the tenants; That so long as the proprietor continued in possession, he could grant tacks with effect; and it has never been imagined, that tenants were bound to search the records for incumbrances, before they ventured to enter into a lease.
Answered; The tacks in question would have been good against the heir of the proprietor; they might perhaps have been good against a voluntary purchaser; but they cannot be sustained against onerous creditors, who stand in a very different situation, and against whom the prorogation of a tack has not, in any instance, been sustained.
Act. Crosbie. Alt. Armstrong.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting