BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> James Herriot v John Wight. [1780] Mor 661 (20 January 1780)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1780/Mor0200661-060.html
Cite as: [1780] Mor 661

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1780] Mor 661      

Subject_1 ARBITRATION.
Subject_2 Oversman.

James Herriot
v.
John Wight

Date: 20 January 1780
Case No. No 60.

The devolution to an oversman must be signed by the arbiters before witnesses.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

These parties submitted all disputes between them to James Ronaldson and John Scott as arbiters; with powers, in case of variance, to elect an oversman. The arbiters differed in opinion, and made choice of Robert Wight, who gave a judgment in favour of Herriot.

In a suspension of this judgment, “the Lords found, That the devolution to the oversman, not being attested by witnesses, in terms of the statute 1681, was void and ineffectual.”

Lord Ordinary, Alva. Act. Little. R. Dundas. Alt. Maclaurin. Clerk, Tait. Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 36. Fac. Col. No. 102. p. 195.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1780/Mor0200661-060.html