BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Ranking of the Creditors of the York-Buildings Company. [1783] Mor 11403 (31 January 1783)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1783/Mor2711403-069.html
Cite as: [1783] Mor 11403

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1783] Mor 11403      

Subject_1 PRESUMPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION II.

Payment when presumed.
Subject_3 SECT. II.

Apocha trium annorum. - Taciturnity.

Ranking of the Creditors of the York-Buildings Company

Date: 31 January 1783
Case No. No 69.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The greatest part of the debts due by the York-Buildings Company were constituted in the form of English penal bonds, the nature of which is, that the debtor, upon his failure to pay at the stipulated term, is subjected in the double of the sums advanced.

The creditors in some of these bonds, upon which no diligence had followed for more than 20 years after the term of payment, having claimed to be ranked, the common agent

Pleaded, By the law of England, which must limit the endurance of debts contracted in that country, a presumption of payment arises from bonds of this sort having been allowed to lie over for 20 years, which cannot be elided but by proof brought by the creditor that the debt is still outstanding.

Answered, The bankrupt situation of the Company ever since these bonds were granted, and the real incumbrances which affected their property of every kind, remove in this case all presumption of payment arising from the creditors' taciturnity.

The Lords “repelled the objection, in respect, from the special circumstances of this case, there is no room for the presumption of the bonds having been paid by the Company.”

Reporter, Lord Monboddo. Partibus ut supra. Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 120. Fac. Col. No 86. p. 133.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1783/Mor2711403-069.html