BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Petition - H. H. Drummond [1866] ScotLR 1_215 (13 March 1866)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1866/01SLR0215.html
Cite as: [1866] ScotLR 1_215, [1866] SLR 1_215

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 215

Court of Session Inner House First Division.

Tuesday, March 13. 1866.

1 SLR 215

Petition—H. H. Drummond.

Subject_1Process
Subject_220 and 21 Vict. c. 56
Subject_3Petition.
Facts:

Question whether a petition for the recal of an appointment of a curator bonis made by the Inner House should be presented to the Junior Lord Ordinary, or to the Inner House.

Headnote:

This was an application by Mr Home Drummond, in which he stated that he desired to be relieved of an office of curator bonis, to which he had been

Page: 216

appointed by the Court in the year 1832. He therefore prayed for the recall of his appointment, and the appointment of a successor. The petition had been presented to the junior Lord Ordinary, who ordered intimation and service. The petition was in his Lordship's roll to-day, and he reported it in respect of a doubt as to whether, under section 4 of the Distribution of Business Act, 20 and 21 Vict. c. 56, the application being “incidental to an action or cause actually depending,” had been competently presented to him. The petitioner referred to the case of Kyle, 10th June 1862 ( 24 D. 1083).

The Court, having expressed opinions to the effect that the competency of applying to the Lord Ordinary, in the circumstances, was, at least, doubtful, and that it would not be prudent to run the risk of having the proceeding declared hereafter invalid, the petition was abandoned, and a new one presented to the Inner House.

Counsel:

Counsel for Petitioner— Mr Dundas and Mr Shand. Agents— Messrs Dundas & Wilson, C.S.

1866


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1866/01SLR0215.html