BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Dennistoun v. Rainey, Knox & Co. and Others [1871] ScotLR 8_501 (16 May 1871)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1871/08SLR0501.html
Cite as: [1871] SLR 8_501, [1871] ScotLR 8_501

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 501↓

Court of Session Inner House First Division.

Tuesday, May 16. 1871.

8 SLR 501

Dennistoun

v.

Rainey, Knox & Co. and Others

Subject_1Process
Subject_2Judicature Act
Subject_3Appeal
Subject_4Jury Trial.
Facts:

A cause having been appealed from a Sheriff Court under § 40 of the Judicature Act for trial by jury, a motion by the appellant to have the cause tried by a judge without a jury refused.

Headnote:

This was an appeal from the Sheriff-court of Glasgow, brought under § 40 of the Judicature Act (6 Geo. IV. c. 120). The Sheriff having ordered a proof, the pursuer appealed the cause to the Court of Session for trial by jury.

The Solicitor-General and Shand, for the appellant, now moved to have the case tried by one of the Judges of the Division without a jury, or to be remitted to the Outer House, to be tried by a Lord Ordinary without a jury, inasmuch as the case was not suited for a jury.

Watson and Mackintosh for the respondents.

At advising—

 Judgment:

Lord President—The proposal of the appellants is that the case shall be tried by one of the Judges of this Division or a Lord Ordinary without a jury. It is important to express our views on this application. The appellant could not be here, at this stage, except under § 40 of the Judicature Act. The object of the Legislature, throughout the section, was to prevent Sheriff-court cases being appealed to the House of Lords on matters of fact. The enactments to prevent this are very carefully framed. The leading enactment is that the interlocutors of this Court on proofs taken in the inferior Courts shall be final as to matters of fact, and accordingly that the Court shall specify in the judgment the facts on which it proceeds in the form of special findings. Then power is given to the Court to supplement the proof in the inferior Court. Then at the end of the section it is provided that if a litigant in the inferior Court desires to have the facts of his cause ascertained by jury, he shall be allowed to advocate as soon as an interlocutor has been pronounced allowing proof, but if he does not avail himself of that permission he is held to have waived his right of appeal to the House of Lords against any judgment on the facts which may afterwards be pronounced by this Court. The effect of granting the appellant's motion would be that any finding in fact would be subject to the review of the House of Lords. This would be a manifest evasion of the Judicature Act. I do not desire to decide this as a question of competency. We must give full and fair effect to § 40. The appellant must either go back to the Sheriff or take an issue for jury trial.

The other judges concurred.

The Court refused the motion of the appellant; and, on the further motion of the appellant, allowed him to lodge issues.

Solicitors: Agents for Appellant — Hamilton, Kinnear & Beatson, W.S.

Agents for Respondents— Webster & Will, S.S.C.

 1871

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1871/08SLR0501.html