BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Stewart's Trustees v. Stewart [1913] ScotLR 183 (12 December 1913)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1913/51SLR0183.html
Cite as: [1913] ScotLR 183, [1913] SLR 183

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 183

Court of Session Inner House Second Division.

Friday, December 12. 1913.

51 SLR 183

Stewart's Trustees

v.

Stewart.

Subject_1Succession
Subject_2Heritable or Moveable
Subject_3Debenture Stock of Limited Company
Subject_4Jus relictce — Agreement between Company and Trustees for Stockholders Providing that Stock be Personal Estate — Act 1661, cap. 32.
Facts:

An agreement between a limited company and the trustees for the holders of the company's debenture stock provided that the stock “shall be, and shall have the incidents of, personal estate.” Held, in a question with the widow of a holder of the stock claiming jus relictæ out of it, that notwithstanding this provision the stock was heritable quoad the widow's rights.

Headnote:

John Charles Stewart of Kinlochmoidart, Inverness-shire, and others, the testamentary trustees of the late Francis Pott Stewart, Craigweil, Ayr, who died on 26th November 1890, leaving his whole estate, heritable and moveable, to them as trustees, first parties; James Todd Stewart and Andrew Falconer, testamentary trustees of the late John Stewart, a brother of the testator, second parties; Frederick Campbell Stewart and William Stewart Fraser, testamentary trustees of the late Robert Stewart, another brother of the testator, third parties (Robert and his brother John being the testator's sole heirs in mobilibus); Robert Stewart and others, children or re-presentatives of children of the late John Stewart, fourth parties; John Charles Stewart and Frederick Campbell Stewart, the two sons of the late Robert Stewart, fifth parties; Mrs Louisa Gertrude Stewart or Swinburne and Mrs Frances Elizabeth Stewart or Wilson, the two daughters of Robert Stewart, with their respective husband's consent, sixth parties; ana Mrs Agnes Craig Moore or Stewart or Battcock, formerly widow of the testator, and her second husband William Frederick Battcock, as her curator and administrator—in-law. seventh parties, presented a Special Case for the opinion and judgment of the

Court, dealing with, inter alia, the interest in certain debenture stock held by the testator at his death, being a surplus of the income of his estate not required for carrying out the trust purposes, and falling, in consequence, into intestacy.

The Case stated, inter alia—“(12) The estate of the testator at the time of his death consisted, inter alia, of £6000 4 1 4 per cent. mortgage debenture stock of the Distillers Company, Limited. This stock is secured over certain heritable and leasehold property of the company in terms of or in manner set forth in the deed of agreement, dated 13th, 14th, and 15th days of April 1887, executed by and between the said company of the one part and certain trustees for the holders of the said stock of the other part, and was redeemable in the company's option after 1st January 1907, on six months' notice, at £110 per cent.”

Clause 2 of the deed of agreement provided, inter alia—“The said stock shall be, and shall have the incidents of, personal estate.”

The following question of law was, inter alia, stated:—“Is the widow entitled to jus relictæ … ( b) out of the income of the investment of £6000 … mentioned in statement 12?”

Argued for all the parties other than the seventh parties—The bond in question bore interest for a tract of time current at the testator's death, and was therefore, under the Act 1661, cap. 32, heritable quoad the widow's rights— Downie v. Downie's Trustees, July 14, 1866, 4 Macph. 1067, 2 S.L.R. 204, Dawson's Trustees v. Dawson, July 9, 1896, 23 R. 1006, 33 S.L.R. 749; Bennett's Executrix v. Bennett's Executors, 1907 S.C. 598, 44 S.L.R. 486; Stark v. Stark, 1910 S.C. 397, 47 S.L.R. 398; Heath v. Grant's Trustees, 1913 S.C. 78, 50 S.L.R. 38.

Argued for the seventh parties—The clause in the agreement expressly provided that the stock in question should have the incidents of personal estate, and this took it out of the ambit of the statute and the cases referred to. [ Cp. The Companies Clauses Act 1863 (26 and 27 Vict., cap. 118), section 23, not referred to.]

At advising—

Judgment:

Lord Dundas—[ In dealing with the widow's claim for jus relictæ]—The trust estate at the testator's death consisted, inter alia, of ( a) £6000 4 1 4 per cent. mortgage debenture stock of the Distillers Company, Limited; ( b) debenture bonds bearing interest at various rates payable half-yearly by the New Zealand and Australian Land Company, Limited; and ( c) a sum of £10,000, being balance due to the testator of a loan by him to his brother Robert at interest for ten years from 1888, under an agreement. All these items bore interest for a tract of time current at the testator's death. They are therefore prima facie moveable quoad his succession, but heritable in a question of his widow's rights. But a special argument was presented for the widow in regard to the mortgage debenture stock of the Distillers Company. The agreement between that company and trustees for the stockholders

Page: 184

is printed ad longum in the appendix. The holders are given preferable security over the company's heritable property. The terms of the conditions of issue of the stock are set forth in Schedule A annexed to the agreement. Clause 2 of the agreement, after providing that the stockholders shall have and be subject to the whole rights, privileges, obligations, and others specified in the conditions of issue in Schedule A, ends with the words—“The said stock shall be, and shall have the incidents of, personal estate.” Counsel for the widow founded upon these words as importing that this stock is declared to be, for all purposes, personal estate, and argued that it must therefore be subject to jus relictæ in a question with the widow of a deceased stockholder. It seems to me improbable that the framers of this agreement had any such case in mind, or had any intention to effect a variation on the application of the general law of the land. I think it is more reasonable to suppose that the words quoted—though redundant, perhaps, and unnecessary—were introduced in order to make as clear as possible what is expressly stated in article 10 of Schedule A, viz., that executors of a deceased stockholder were alone to be recognised by the company as having any title to the share registered in his name. But, however this may be, the words appear to me to be, in my view, too wide and vague to achieve the purpose for which they are founded on by counsel for the widow. “Personal estate” or its “incidents” might refer equally well to estate personal at common law, or to estate made personal by the Statute 1661, cap. 32. But the latter view would not suit the widow's contention at all It would exclude her claim. I think, though the point is novel and a little puzzling, that her argument must fail. I am therefore for answering branch ( b) of the seventh question in the negative.

The Lord Justice-Clerk and Lord Guthrie concurred.

Lord Salvesen was absent.

The Court answered branch ( b) of the seventh question of law in the negative.

Counsel:

Counsel for the First Parties— D. P. Fleming. Agents— Webster, Will, & Company, W.S.

Counsel for the Second and Third Parties— Blackburn, K.C.— Maconochie. Agents— Fraser, Stodart, & Ballingall, W.S.

Counsel for the Fourth Parties— Murray, K.C.— Maclaren. Agents— Cumming& Duff, S.S.C.

Counsel for the Fifth Parties— Moncrieff, K.C.—R. C. Henderson. Agents— Fraser, Stodart, & Ballingall, W.S.

Counsel for the Sixth Parties— Fleming, K.C.— Inglis. Agents— Fraser, Stodart, & Ballingall, W.S.

Counsel for the Seventh Parties— Constable, K.C.— Kemp. Agents— Wishart & Sanderson, W.S.

1913


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1913/51SLR0183.html