Arcadis NV v Adams (t/a 3DWeb Online Services) [2009] DRS 6679 (23 February 2009)

DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICE DRS 06679

Decision of Independent Expert (Summary Decision)

Arcadis NV

and

Mark Adams

1. The Parties:

Complainant: Arcadis N.V.

Narrow Quay

Country: GB

Respondent: Mark Adams t/a 3DWeb Online Services

Country: GB

2. The Domain Name(s):

arcadis.co.uk

3. Notification of Complaint

I hereby certify that I am satisfied that Nominet has sent the complaint to the respondent in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Procedure.

X Yes D No

4. Rights

The complainant has, to my reasonable satisfaction, shown Rights in respect of a name or mark which is identical or similar to the Domain name.

X Yes □ No

5. Abusive Registration

The complainant has, to my reasonable satisfaction, shown that the Domain name [enter domain name(s)] is an Abusive Registration

X Yes □ No

6. Other Factors

I am satisfied that no other factors apply which would make a summary decision unconscionable in all the circumstances

X Yes □ No

7. Comments (optional)

8. Decision transfer

Signed: Peter Davies

Dated: 23 February 2009

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service >> Arcadis NV v Adams (t/a 3DWeb Online Services) [2009] DRS 6679 (23 February 2009) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/DRS/2009/6679.html Cite as: [2009] DRS 6679


	DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICE DRS 06679 Decision of Independent Expert (Summary Decision)

	Arcadis NV and Mark Adams

	1. The Parties: Complainant: Arcadis N.V. Narrow Quay Country: GB

	Respondent: Mark Adams t/a 3DWeb Online Services Country: GB

	2. The Domain Name(s): arcadis.co.uk

	1



	3. Notification of Complaint I hereby certify that I am satisfied that Nominet has sent the complaint to the respondent in accordance with paragraphs 2 and 4 of the Procedure. X Yes D No 4. Rights The complainant has, to my reasonable satisfaction, shown Rights in respect of a name or mark which is identical or similar to the Domain name. X Yes □ No 5. Abusive Registration The complainant has, to my reasonable satisfaction, shown that the Domain name [enter domain name(s)] is an Abusive Registration X Yes □ No 6. Other Factors I am satisfied that no other factors apply which would make a summary decision unconscionable in all the circumstances X Yes □ No 7. Comments (optional)

	8. Decision transfer

	Signed: Peter Davies Dated: 23 February 2009

	2

Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service