![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA097112014 [2014] UKAITUR IA097112014 (20 August 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA097112014.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA97112014, [2014] UKAITUR IA097112014 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/09711/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House | Determination Promulgated |
On 14 August 2014 | On 20 August 2014 |
|
|
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE APPLEYARD
Between
Miss Aasma Shaheen
Appellant
and
THE Secretary of State FOR THE Home Department
Respondent
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
1. The appellant is a citizen of Pakistan who applied for leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 2 Migrant under the points-based system and against whom the respondent made directions pursuant to Section 47 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 to remove her.
2. She appealed the respondent’s decision and in a determination promulgated on 6 June 2014 Judge of the First‑tier Tribunal Lester dismissed the appellant’s appeal. In so doing she recorded at paragraph 16 that the Section 47 direction was invalid by reason of the authority of Ahmadi v SSHD [2013] EWCA Civ 512 and then dismissed the appeal under the Immigration Rules.
3. The appellant sought permission to appeal. However, it was not granted. The judge did though, of his own volition, grant permission on what he deemed to be a “Robinson obvious” point. He found that the Section 47 decision was not invalid as the judge had failed to take account of Section 51 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013.
4. The appellant’s representatives wrote to the Tribunal in a letter dated 11 August 2014 asking for her appeal to be withdrawn.
5. Whilst the judge did err in her consideration of Section 47 I would not have found that this was a material error. However, in light of the correspondence from those representing the appellant I treat these proceedings as now being concluded by reason of the appellant withdrawing her appeal.
Signed Date 19 August 2014.
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Appleyard