![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA257212014 & IA257172014 [2015] UKAITUR IA257212014 (29 June 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/IA257212014.html Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR IA257212014 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA/25721/2014
& IA/25717/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Determined at Field House |
Decisions & Reasons Promulgated |
On: 26 June 2015 |
29 June 2015 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RINTOUL
Between
JUAN DONG (1)
PEIHONG LI (2)
Appellants
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND
REASONS FOR THE TRIBUNAL GIVING CONSENT
1. The appellants are citizens of China who appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the Secretary of State of 9 June 2014. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the appeal in a determination promulgated on 1 October 2014. First-tier Tribunal Judge Kelly granted the appellant permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
2. By way of a letter dated 26 June 2015 to the Upper Tribunal from the First Appellant, written also on behalf of her son, the Second Appellant, the appellants state that they wish their appeals to be treated as withdrawn by the Upper Tribunal.
3. Consent of the Upper Tribunal is required for a party to withdraw its case. Having carefully considered the facts of this appeal as a whole, and observing that the Secretary of State was the successful party before the First-tier Tribunal, I give such consent to the appellant to withdraw his case.
4. Accordingly with my consent, and pursuant to rule 17(5) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, this appeal is recorded as “Withdrawn with the consent of the Upper Tribunal”. This is a Notice pursuant to rule 17(5) to inform the parties that the appellant’s case is withdrawn.
5. The effect of the appellants’ case being withdrawn from the Upper Tribunal is that the proceedings before the Upper Tribunal are at an end. There is no appeal before the Upper Tribunal and the First-tier Tribunal’s decision shall stand.
Signed Date: 26 June 2015
Upper Tribunal Judge Rintoul