BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA444552014 & Ors. [2015] UKAITUR IA444552014 (27 November 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/IA444552014.html Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR IA444552014 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA/44455/2014
IA/44456/2014
IA/44458/2014
IA/44459/2014
IA/44457/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Determined at Field House |
Decision and Reasons Promulgated |
|
On 26 November 2015 |
On 27 November 2015 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE O'CONNOR
Between
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Appellant
and
James Mwuara Njuguna
Jane Wanjiku Karumbo
Sanchez Karumbo
Shanice Karumbo
Scholes Karumbo
Respondents
NOTICE OF DECISION
1. The Secretary of State brings an appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the decision of FTTJ Shergill, allowing the appellants' appeals against decisions to remove them from the UK. Permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal was granted on the 22 September 2015.
2. The Secretary of State has, by letter dated 13 November 2015, granted the appellants leave to remain outside of the Immigration Rules. The appellants' section 82 appeals are consequently to be treated as abandoned pursuant to section 104(4A) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 from the point in time that the grant of leave was made.
3. This, however, does not bring the proceedings before the Upper Tribunal to an end. The Secretary of State has not withdrawn her appeals before the Upper Tribunal, and although they have attempted to do so, the Respondents cannot withdraw the appeals because they have no appeals before the Upper Tribunal.
4. Given the circumstances of these appeals it is prudent for the Tribunal to bring the proceedings to an end and I do so by dismissing the Secretary of State's appeals in the above referenced cases. Such decision is no reflection on the merits of the case, which I have not considered - it is made in order to dispose of the appeals which, for the reasons given above, have become unnecessary.
Signed
Upper Tribunal Judge O'Connor
Date: 26 November 2015
