![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA000492015 [2015] UKAITUR PA000492015 (7 October 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/PA000492015.html Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR PA000492015, [2015] UKAITUR PA492015 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/00049/2015
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Decided at Field House without a hearing |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 7 October 2015 |
On 1 September 2015 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PERKINS
Between
AHSAN NADEEM
Appellant
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1) On 14 July 2015 the First-tier Tribunal gave the Appellant permission to appeal the decision (hereinafter "the Decision") of the First-tier Tribunal promulgated on 23 June 2015 dismissing the Appellant's appeal against a decision of the Respondent to remove him from the United Kingdom.
2) The appeal was determined under "The Fast-track Rules" under Schedule Rule 1(3) to the Tribunal Procedure Rules 2014.
3) By a Decision of the President of the First-tier Tribunal, Immigration and Asylum Chamber, under rule 32 of the Tribunal Procedure Rules 2014, sent to the parties on 18 August 2015, the First-tier Tribunal set aside the Decision. The Decision was set aside following the decision of the Court of Appeal in The Lord Chancellor v Detention Action [2015] EWCA Civ 840.
4) I saw no useful purpose in the Upper Tribunal making any reasoned decision on the appeal and I was minded to dismiss the appeal without considering the merits.
5) A Memorandum and Directions setting out my view was sent to the parties on 2 September 2105 inviting them to respond. A similar Memorandum and Directions had been sent to the parties previously but the Appellant was served at the wrong address.
6) There has been no response from either party.
7) I see no disadvantage to the Appellant in dismissing his appeal to the Upper Tribunal. The First-tier Tribunal must re-determine his appeal.
8) In the circumstances I dismiss the Appellant's appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
Signed |
|
Jonathan Perkins Judge of the Upper Tribunal |
Dated 30 September 2015 |