BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> AA099312008 [2016] UKAITUR AA099312008 (15 February 2016)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2016/AA099312008.html
Cite as: [2016] UKAITUR AA99312008, [2016] UKAITUR AA099312008

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal number: AA/09931/2008

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS



Heard at Field House

Decision & Reasons Promulgated

On 10 February 2016

On 15 February 2016

 

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GLEESON

 

 

Between

 

Yong Hack Jen

Appellant

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent


 

NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT

Pursuant to paragraph 17A of the

Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 (as amended)

1.              The appellant, a citizen of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea), appealed to the Upper Tribunal against the First-tier Tribunal determination dismissing his appeal against the respondent's decision to set removal directions to the Republic of Korea (South Korea), after refusing him refugee status, humanitarian protection, or leave to remain in the United Kingdom on human rights grounds.

2.              Paragraph 17A(1) requires a party to an asylum or immigration case to notify the Upper Tribunal where the appellant has been granted leave to remain. On 13 September 2013, the respondent granted the appellant refugee status. The claim was recorded as determined on 9 March 2009. By a letter dated 27 November 2014 the appellant's solicitors informed the Upper Tribunal of the respondent's decision, indicating that they had closed the appellant's file.

3.              An appeal may be treated as abandoned or finally determined for the reasons set out at section 102(4) and 102(4A)-(4C) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (as amended), which so far as relevant to this appeal are as follows:

" (4A) An appeal under section 82(1) brought by a person while he is in the United Kingdom shall be treated as abandoned if the appellant is granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom (subject to subsections (4B) and (4C)).

(4B) Subsection (4A) shall not apply to an appeal in so far as it is brought on the ground relating to the Refugee Convention specified in section 84(1)(g) where the appellant—

(a)           is granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a period exceeding 12 months, and

(b)           gives notice, in accordance with any relevant procedural rules (which may include provision about timing), that he wishes to pursue the appeal in so far as it is brought on that ground. ..."

4.              Paragraph 17A(2) requires the Upper Tribunal to send to the parties a notice that the appeal is being treated as abandoned, unless the appellant sends to the Upper Tribunal within 30 days of the grant of leave to remain a notice stating that he wishes to pursue his appeal. No such notice has been received in this appeal.

5.              The Upper Tribunal therefore treats this appeal as abandoned.

 

 

Judith AJC Gleeson

Date: 5 December 2016

Signed: Upper Tribunal Judge Gleeson

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2016/AA099312008.html