BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA296572015 [2017] UKAITUR IA296572015 (6 July 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2017/IA296572015.html Cite as: [2017] UKAITUR IA296572015 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
IAC-AH- LEM-V1
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/29657/2015
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Heard at Birmingham |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
|
On 6 February 2017 |
On 06 July 2017 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE CLIVE LANE
Between
S ecretary of State FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
and
MR Olufemi Abimbola Fagbolade
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mrs Aboni, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
For the Respondent: Not present or represented
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The appellant, Olufemi Abimbola Fagbolade, was born on 9 December 1980 and is a male citizen of Nigeria. He applied for indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom on the basis of the length of his residence. His application was made on 10 December 2014 and was refused by the Secretary of State on 7 August 2015. The appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (Judge James) which, in a decision promulgated on 20 April 2016 allowed the appeal. The Secretary of State now appeals, with permission, to the Upper Tribunal.
2. The judge erred in law such that the decision falls to be set aside. The judge should not have allowed the appeal outright. The judge should have found that, the Secretary of State having accepted that the appellant had been living in the United Kingdom continuously for a period of more than ten years, remitted the matter to the Secretary of State to exercise her discretion which remains vested only in her.
Notice of Decision
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal which was promulgated on 20 April 2016 is set aside. The finding that the appellant had been continuously in lawful residence in the United Kingdom for more than ten years is preserved. The appeal of the appellant against the decision of the respondent dated 7 August 2015 is allowed to the extent that the matter is returned to the Secretary of State so that she may exercise her discretion as to whether to grant the appellant leave to remain.
No anonymity direction is made.
Signed Date 20 February 2017
Upper Tribunal Judge Clive Lane
