BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA013292019 [2019] UKAITUR PA013292019 (12 September 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2019/PA013292019.html Cite as: [2019] UKAITUR PA13292019, [2019] UKAITUR PA013292019 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/01329/2019
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 2 nd September 2019 |
On 12 th September 2019 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE FRANCES
Between
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
and
G R N
(anonymity direction MADE)
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Ms S Cunha, Home Office Presenting Officer
For the Respondent: Mr A Eaton, instructed by Ata & Co Solicitors
DECISION AND REASONS
1. Although this is an appeal by the Secretary of State for the Home Department, I shall refer to the parties as in the First-tier Tribunal. The Appellant's appeal against the refusal of his protection claim was allowed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Andrew on 8 May 2019.
2. The Secretary of State appealed on the grounds that the judge failed to identify a Convention reason and failed to specify what part of the Appellant's case was made out in relation to his protection claim. The reasons for allowing the appeal were unclear.
3. At the hearing before me, it was agreed by the parties that the judge had made errors of law. I find that the judge made errors of law as identified in the grant of permission dated 25 July 2019. In particular, the judge failed to give adequate reasons for allowing the appeal on any basis.
4. Accordingly, I have decided in accordance with paragraph 7.2 of the Practice Statements of 25 September 2012 that the decision should be set aside and the appeal remitted to the First-tier Tribunal. None of the judge's findings are preserved.
Notice of decision
Appeal allowed and remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for re-hearing
Direction Regarding Anonymity - Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
Unless and until a Tribunal or court directs otherwise, the Appellant is granted anonymity. No report of these proceedings shall directly or indirectly identify her or any member of her family. This direction applies both to the Appellant and to the Respondent. Failure to comply with this direction could lead to contempt of court proceedings.
DIRECTIONS
(i) The Tribunal is directed pursuant to section 12(3) of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 to reconsider the appeal at a hearing before a First-tier Tribunal Judge other than First-tier Tribunal Judge Andrew.
(ii) The parties to serve all further documentary material on which they intend to rely not later than 7 days before the date of hearing.
J Frances
Signed Date: 2 September 2019
Upper Tribunal Judge Frances