BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA030372018 [2019] UKAITUR PA030372018 (16 December 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2019/PA030372018.html Cite as: [2019] UKAITUR PA30372018, [2019] UKAITUR PA030372018 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/03037/2018
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Field House |
Decision Promulgated |
|
On 11 December 2019 |
On 16 December 2019 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KOPIECZEK
Between
ISAAC [O]
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)
Appellant
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Ms D. Revill, Counsel
For the Respondent: Mr E. Tufan, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 40(3)(a) OF THE TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008
1. The appellant, a citizen of Nigeria, appealed to the First-tier Tribunal ("FtT") against a decision dated 19 December 2018, being a decision to refuse a protection and human rights claim in the context of a decision to make a deportation order pursuant to section 32(5) of the UK Borders Act 2007. Within the decision the respondent also issued a certificate under section 72 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. The FtT dismissed the appellant's appeal.
2. At the hearing before me on 11 December 2019 it was agreed between the parties that the FtT erred in law for the reasons advanced in the grounds of appeal upon which permission to appeal was granted.
3. It was further agreed between the parties that the errors of law are such as to require the decision of the FtT to be set aside and for the appeal to be remitted to the FtT for a hearing de novo.
4. In the circumstances, I set aside the decision of the FtT for error of law and remit the appeal to the FtT for a hearing de novo, on all grounds, before a judge other than First-tier Tribunal Judge Lucas, with no findings of fact preserved.
5. In remitting the appeal I have had regard to paragraph 7.2 of the Practice Statement of the Senior President of Tribunals.
6. Pursuant to rule 40(3)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, no reasons (or further reasons) are required, the decision being made with the consent of the parties.
Upper Tribunal Judge Kopieczek 11/12/19
