BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> UI2024001111 [2024] UKAITUR UI2024001111 (4 September 2024) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2024/UI2024001111.html Cite as: [2024] UKAITUR UI2024001111 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
|
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER |
Case No: UI-2024-001111 FTT No: PA/57182/2023 LP/00586/2024 |
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Decision & Reasons Issued:
On 4 September 2024
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LANE
Between
AS
(ANONYMITY ORDER MADE)
Appellant
and
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent
Representation:
For the Appellant: Mr Holmes
For the Respondent: Mr Diwnycz ,Senior Presenting Officer
Heard at Phoenix House (Bradford) on 31 May 2024
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The appellant is a male citizen of Albania born on 28 October 2006. He appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against a decision of the Secretary of State dated 13 September 2023 refusing his claim for international protection. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed his appeal and the appellant now appeals to the Upper Tribunal.
2. At the initial hearing at Bradford on 31 May 2024, Mr Diwnycz, Senior Presenting Officer who appeared for the Secretary of State, acknowledged that the judge had erred in law for those reasons asserted in the grounds of appeal which are succinctly summarised by Judge Sills in his grant of permission:
The grounds identify arguable errors of law. In particular, it is arguable that the Judge erred in law in failing to consider the Appellant's age when considering his failure to claim asylum before reaching the UK. It is also arguable that the Judge acted unfairly and in breach of the Surendran guidelines by making adverse findings on factual matters that the Respondent had not disputed. These adverse findings, for instance at [68], were arguably relevant to the Judge's assessment of the risk on return.
3. In the circumstances , I set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal. None of the findings of fact shall stand. The appeal is returned to the First-tier Tribunal for that Tribunal to remake the decision following a hearing de novo.
Notice of Decision
I set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal. None of the findings of fact shall stand. The appeal is returned to the First-tier Tribunal for that Tribunal to remake the decision following a hearing de novo.
C. N. Lane
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Immigration and Asylum Chamber
Dated: 22 July 2024
