 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Newbury v Arcade Motors Ltd [1994] UKEAT 681_93_0610 (6 October 1994) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1994/681_93_0610.html Cite as: [1994] UKEAT 681_93_610, [1994] UKEAT 681_93_0610 |
||
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
I N T E R N A L
At the Tribunal
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MUMMERY (P)
MR J D DALY
MR J C RAMSAY
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING
Revised
APPEARANCES
For the Appellant NO APPEARANCE BY OR
REPRESENTATION
ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT
MR JUSTICE MUMMERY (PRESIDENT): This is an appeal against the decision of the Industrial Tribunal held at London North on 8 June 1993. For the Full Reasons sent to the parties on 27 July 1993 the Tribunal held that Mr Newbury's dismissal by the Respondents, Arcade Motors Ltd, was fair. Mr Newbury was dissatisfied with that decision and appealed by Notice of Appeal dated 24 August 1993. His grounds of appeal were that the Industrial Tribunal reached an unreasonable conclusion on the facts, that a proper investigation had not taken place by the Respondents, that relevant enquiries had not been made, that no notes of final proceedings leading to his dismissal were made and that he had no chance to atone and was summarily dismissed without being reminded of his right to appeal.
The matter was listed for hearing. A letter was received from the representatives of Mr Newbury saying that they were without instructions and no longer able to represent him in the case. Mr Newbury himself has not, despite being told of the situation with his legal advisers, instructed either them or other representatives and he has not attended the hearing of the appeal today.
In those circumstances his appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute.