BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Oderinde v. Datapack Ltd [2000] UKEAT 611_00_1511 (15 November 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/611_00_1511.html
Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 611__1511, [2000] UKEAT 611_00_1511

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] UKEAT 611_00_1511
Appeal No. EAT/611/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 15 November 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE H WILSON

MS N AMIN

MR D CHADWICK



MS IDAYATU ODERINDE APPELLANT

DATAPACK LTD RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING – EX PARTE

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR S SIMBLET
    (of Counsel)
    Messrs Bindman & Partners
    Solicitors
    275 Gray's Inn Road
    London
    WC1X 8QF
       


     

    JUDGE WILSON: This has been the preliminary hearing of the proposed appeal by the appellant concerning the second decision of the Employment Tribunal sitting at London (South) on 28th February 2000 which was a hearing to determine the appropriate compensation for the unfair dismissal, which had previously been found at a hearing in 1999 by the same tribunal.

  1. We have benefited from a skeleton argument submitted on behalf of the proposed appellant by Mr Simblet and from the grounds of appeal, which he also drafted.
  2. In our view, the matter should proceed to full argument on the matters set out in paragraphs 11 to 16 of the Notice of Appeal under the subheading of "Grounds of Appeal". No other matters are for full argument.
  3. We consider that the case should be listed as Category C with an estimate of two hours.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/611_00_1511.html