BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> The Medical Protection Society Ltd v. Rees [2000] UKEAT 715_00_0612 (6 December 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/715_00_0612.html
Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 715_00_0612, [2000] UKEAT 715__612

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] UKEAT 715_00_0612
Appeal No. EAT/715/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 6 December 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE D PUGSLEY

MR D NORMAN

MR T C THOMAS CBE



THE MEDICAL PROTECTION SOCIETY LTD APPELLANT

MISS A REES RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR P GILROY
    (Of Counsel)
    Instructed by
    Eversheds
    Cloth Hall Court
    Infirmary Street
    Leeds
    LS1 2JB
       


     

    JUDGE PUGSLEY

  1. This is a case where all we have to decide is whether there is an arguable point. In this case we are assisted by Mr Gilroy who appears on behalf of the Appellant. The essential feature running through these grounds of appeal is that the Tribunal misdirected itself as to the proper construction of the disciplinary hearing and indeed was imposing a requirement that the employee should be consulted at every stage; even if as to whether there should be a disciplinary hearing.
  2. Certain subsidiary points are made thereafter but that, I think it would be fair to say, is a central point that this Tribunal was imposing far too high a standard by its construction of disciplinary procedure as to contractual requirements imposed on the employer. Mr Gilroy contends that the Tribunal went on to misdirect itself as to the breaches of the implied contractual obligation of mutual trust and confidence.
  3. We are all of the view that the matters raised are arguable. We do not think it would be right to get beyond that. The time estimate is three hours; Category C. Leave given to amend the ground of appeal within 14 days of this judgment.
  4. The Chairman's Notes to be given on the limited basis sought.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/715_00_0612.html