![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Corke v. Wilson [2001] UKEAT 914_00_2601 (26 January 2001) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2001/914_00_2601.html Cite as: [2001] UKEAT 914_00_2601, [2001] UKEAT 914__2601 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
At the Tribunal | |
Before
MR RECORDER UNDERHILL QC
MS H PITCHER
MR N D WILLIS
APPELLANT | |
RESPONDENT |
Transcript of Proceedings
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING
For the Appellant | MR A THOMAS Ross-on-Wye Services Ltd Unit 5, Croft Court Crofts Lane Ross on Wye Hertfordshire HR9 7AB |
MR RECORDER UNDERHILL QC
"1. At paragraph 36 of the decision the Tribunal awarded the Applicant £3000 for loss of earnings. The Tribunal erred in law because they failed to take into account the fact that the employer Newfield & Co, a firm of solicitors, was intervened and closed by the Law Society on or around the 10th of November [1999].
2. In the extended reasons the Tribunal found that the Applicant resigned with effect from 24th of June 1999. Given the novus actus interveniens of closure of the firm of Newfield & Co this must limit loss of earnings."
By a letter of 10 November 2000 from Mr Thomas on his behalf, Mr Corke asked for an additional ground to be added, namely that:
"3 The Employment Tribunal acted unfairly and unreasonably in staying all cases against Edward Newfield at Ashford except the case against Newfield and Corke."
We deal with those grounds in turn.