BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) >> (1) Imran Khan (2) Kamran Khan v Neelam Naz Khan (Evidence : Expert evidence) [2018] UKFTT 318 (PC) (26 April 2018) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2018/2016_0752.html Cite as: [2018] UKFTT 318 (PC) |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
(1) Imran Khan (2) Kamran Khan v Neelam Naz Khan (Evidence : Expert evidence) /Judgments/j1038/REF-2016-0752.pdf (26 April 2018)
Applicants are brothers: Respondent is the wife of the third (deceased) brother. The property in which Respondent and her children live was registered in her husband-™s name only. Applicants applied to enter a restriction on the grounds that they had a beneficial interest in the property by virtue of a written agreement and/or a resulting trust. Respondent put them to proof of the validity of the written agreement and the contributions. There was no expert hand writing evidence at trial. Late application by Respondent after the hearing but before the decision to adduce expert evidence resulted in Applicant producing their own expert evidence critical of the Respondent's expert, who subsequently withdrew his report. HELD finding was that each brother had a 1/3rd interest.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2018] UKFTT 318 (PC)
