The Official Custodian for Charities on behalf of the Trustees of the Pontrhydyfen Miners Welfare Scheme v (1) Kieron Tomlinson Howells (2) Alison Marjorie Howells (Easements and profits a prendre : Easements and profits a prendre) [2019] UKFTT 113 (PC) (28 January 2019)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) >> The Official Custodian for Charities on behalf of the Trustees of the Pontrhydyfen Miners Welfare Scheme v (1) Kieron Tomlinson Howells (2) Alison Marjorie Howells (Easements and profits a prendre : Easements and profits a prendre) [2019] UKFTT 113 (PC) (28 January 2019)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2019/113.html
Cite as: [2019] UKFTT 113 (PC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]



Decision summary
REF/2018/0246

Case reference REF/2018/0246
Date of decision 28/01/2019
Adjudicator Ms Ann McAllister
Applicant The Official Custodian for Charities on behalf of the Trustees of the Pontrhydyfen Miners Welfare Scheme
Respondent (1) Kieron Tomlinson Howells (2) Alison Marjorie Howells
Main Category & Sub Category
Category Easements and profits a prendre
Sub Category Prescription, requirements and acquisition
Secondary Category & Sub Category
Category Easements and profits a prendre
Sub Category Prescription, requirements and acquisition
Decision notes [2019] UKFTT 113 (PC). application to note the benefit and burden of a right of way over a track through the Respondents’ land leading to a rugby field. The track forms part of a public footpath. The issue was whether the Applicant also has the benefit of a vehicular right of way based on prescriptive use. The field had been part of the welfare scheme since the 1950s, although it was used less frequently, because a new rugby field had been opened. It was still used for training. There was considerable evidence as to vehicular use of the track to reach the field. The Respondents had purchased their land in 2013. I found that they were bound by the right of way under schedule 3 of the 2002 Act: the track was obvious on a reasonable inspection and leads only to the field.
Download decision(s) [2019] UKFTT 113 (PC)  



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2019/113.html