BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Thanet District Council (Local government (District council)) [2015] UKICO FS50574100 (7 September 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2015/FS50574100.html Cite as: [2015] UKICO FS50574100 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
7 September 2015, Local government (District council)
The complainant has requested legal advice received by Thanet District Council (the “Council”) regarding Ramsgate Royal Sands/Pleasurama development. The Council initially refused this citing section 31 (law enforcement) but revised this at internal review, citing section 31, section 42 (legal professional privilege) and section 43 (commercial interests). The Commissioner’s decision is that the Council is entitled to rely on section 42 as its basis for withholding the requested information. No steps are required.
FOI 42: Not upheld
