BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> ARTE OF CERRUTI 1881 (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1999] UKIntelP o10299 (31 March 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1999/o10299.html
Cite as: [1999] UKIntelP o10299

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


ARTE OF CERRUTI 1881 (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1999] UKIntelP o10299 (31 March 1999)

For the whole decision click here: o10299

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/102/99
Decision date
31 March 1999
Hearing officer
Mr M Reynolds
Mark
ARTE OF CERRUTI 1881
Classes
25
Applicant
Cerruti 1881
Opponent
Jon Adam (Sportswear) Limited
Opposition
Section 5(4)(a)*

Result

Section 5(4)(a): - Opposition successful.

Section 5(4)(a): - Opposition successful.

Points Of Interest

Summary

[*Other objections, under Section 3, were not pursued and were withdrawn at the hearing]. The opponents based their oppositions on their own use of the mark ARTE. The applicants contended that the opponents’ mark was a laudatory epithet and a natural way of praising the style of the goods. The Hearing Officer did not accept that such consideration could be decisive in the matter before him, which was one of passing-off. Reviewing the evidence the Hearing Officer concluded that the opponents had a reputation, and there was a real likelihood of confusion and misrepresentation, such that damage would result. The opposition under Section 5(4)(a) succeeded accordingly.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1999/o10299.html