BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> DEVICE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o07300 (28 February 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2000/o07300.html
Cite as: [2000] UKIntelP o07300, [2000] UKIntelP o7300

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


DEVICE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o07300 (28 February 2000)

For the whole decision click here: o07300

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/073/00
Decision date
28 February 2000
Hearing officer
Mr M Foley
Mark
DEVICE
Classes
34
Applicant
N V Sumatra Tobacco Limited
Opponent
Imperial Tobacco
Opposition
Sections 5(2)(b) & 5(4)(a)

Result

Section 5(2)(b) - Opposition failed.

Section 5(4)(a) - Opposition failed.

Points Of Interest

Summary

It was self-evident that the goods in issue were the same. The matter under Section 5(2)(b) therefore came down to a comparison of marks. The Hearing Officer concluded that if there was any similarity "it must rest in the bands and lines as they are the only elements common to both trade marks". In the event the Hearing Officer found no likelihood of confusion, and the ground under Section 5(2)(b) failed accordingly. Under section 5(4)(a) the opposition also failed.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2000/o07300.html