BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> THE GATEHOUSE THEATRE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o32800 (1 September 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2000/o32800.html
Cite as: [2000] UKIntelP o32800

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


THE GATEHOUSE THEATRE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2000] UKIntelP o32800 (1 September 2000)

For the whole decision click here: o32800

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/328/00
Decision date
1 September 2000
Hearing officer
Mr M Knight
Mark
THE GATEHOUSE THEATRE
Classes
41
Applicants
Beryl Scott Smith (Chair of Trustees The Gatehouse Theatre)
Opponents
Ovation Theatres Limited
Opposition
Section 3(3)(b) and Section 5(4)(a)

Result

Section 3(3)(b) - Opposition failed

Section 5(4)(b) - Opposition failed

Points Of Interest

Summary

The applicant’s application was filed on 22 August 1997 and it quickly became clear at the hearing that the opponents could not sustain their objections under Section 5(4)(a) - (Passing Off) - since the earliest date on which they used their mark "UPSTAIRS AT THE GATEHOUSE was in December 1997. They therefore could not claim an earlier right. Opposition failed on this ground.

The opponents objection under Section 3(3)(b) (deception) was also somewhat convoluted since they attempted to argue that the nature of the applicant mark indicated a theatre at a geographical location whereas the Group in question had been putting on various performances for many years at different locations. Having considered the matter fully the Hearing Officer concluding that this was taking much too narrow a view of the mark and the objection was dismissed.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2000/o32800.html