BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Jean -Francois Meunier (Patent) [2001] UKIntelP o01301 (8 January 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o01301.html
Cite as: [2001] UKIntelP o1301, [2001] UKIntelP o01301

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Jean-Francois Meunier [2001] UKIntelP o01301 (8 January 2001)

For the whole decision click here: o01301

Patent decision

BL number
O/013/01
Concerning rights in
WO 95/01045
Hearing Officer
Mr R Walker
Decision date
8 January 2001
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Jean-Francois Meunier
Provisions discussed
PR 1995 rr 85(1) and 110(4)
Keywords
Extensions of time
Related Decisions
None

Summary

An international patent application under the PCT designated, among others, GB and European patent (GB). At the normal time for entry into the national and regional phases the applicant decided to file for a European patent only. The applicants intention was to obtain patent protection in the UK by designating GB in the European patent application. However, by mistake GB was not designated and this mistake not spotted until after the grant of the European patent. The applicant then requested an extension of the period prescribed for the international application to enter the UK national phase. The hearing officer accepted that there had always been an intention to obtain patent protection in the UK but rejected the request because when the applicant had had the opportunity, he had decided not to follow the UK national route. This original decision had not been influenced by any unforeseen circumstances and the request for late entry into the national phase merely represented a change of mind (Heatex Group Ltds Application [1995] RPC 546 followed). The hearing officer also found that refusal of the request for late entry did not conflict with the UKs obligations under the PCT.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o01301.html