BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Silkbill Ltd v Ash Lacy Building Products Ltd (Patent) [2001] UKIntelP o17501 (11 April 2001) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o17501.html Cite as: [2001] UKIntelP o17501 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o17501
Summary
Following initiation of revocation proceedings, the parties agreed to settle their dispute and the applicant for revocation withdrew unconditionally from the proceedings. Following long-standing practice, the hearing officer went on to consider whether the notice of withdrawal should be accepted or whether there were questions needing further consideration in the public interest. Having construed claim 1 of the patent, the hearing officer concluded that a case for revocation had not been made out and so made no order for the revocation of the patent.
