BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> COMFIT (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2001] UKIntelP o44301 (5 October 2001)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o44301.html
Cite as: [2001] UKIntelP o44301

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


COMFIT (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2001] UKIntelP o44301 (5 October 2001)

For the whole decision click here: o44301

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/443/01
Decision date
5 October 2001
Hearing officer
Mr D Landau
Mark
COMFIT
Classes
11
Applicant
SITECO Beleuchtungstechnik GmbH
Opponents
Whitecroft Lighting (Holdings) Limited
Opposition
Sections 3(6); 5(2)(b) & 5(4)(a)

Result

Section 3(6) - Opposition dismissed

Section 5(2)(b) - Opposition successful

Section 5(4)(a) - Opposition failed

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opposition was based on the opponents’ registration of their mark COMFORT. The Hearing Officer found:- (i) the opponent had not established that reputation, recognition or goodwill resided in their earlier registration; (ii) the respective specifications encompassed identical or highly similar goods: (iii) there was a degree of visual similarity between the respective trade marks and there was a likelihood of confusion. The opposition under Section 5(2)(b) succeeded, therefore and the Section 5(4)(a) objection failed. The Section 3(6) objection was dismissed as the opponents’ case was based on supposition, presumption and conjecture.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2001/o44301.html