BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> CLAXXAN (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2002] UKIntelP o15202 (4 April 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o15202.html
Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o15202

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


CLAXXAN (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2002] UKIntelP o15202 (4 April 2002)

For the whole decision click here: o15202

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/152/02
Decision date
4 April 2002
Hearing officer
Mr E S Smith
Mark
CLAXXAN
Classes
09
Applicant for Invalidity
Kaga Electronics Co Ltd
Registered Proprietor
ARP Datacon AG
Invalidity
Sections 47(2)(a) & 5(2)(b)

Result

Section 47(2)(a) - Invalidity action failed

Section 5(2)(b) - Invalidity action failed

Points Of Interest

Summary

The applicants application for a declaration of invalidity was based on their ownership of two registrations in Class 9 for the mark TAXAN in respect of the same and similar goods to those of the registered proprietor.

The registered proprietor was advised of the application but neither filed a counterstatement or any submissions in response. The applicants filed no evidence or submissions in support of their application for invalidity.

Under Section 5(2)(b) the Hearing Officer noted that identical and similar goods were at issue and went on to compare the respective marks. Because of the difference in the first syllable of the respective marks, and because of the importance of this aspect when comparing marks, the Hearing Officer concluded that overall the marks were not similar. The application for invalidity therefore failed.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o15202.html