BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Howard Anthony Quinn v Decalite Limited David Pearson (Patent) [2002] UKIntelP o22202 (24 May 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o22202.html
Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o22202

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Howard Anthony Quinn v Decalite Limited David Pearson [2002] UKIntelP o22202 (24 May 2002)

For the whole decision click here: o22202

Patent decision

BL number
O/222/02
Concerning rights in
GB9905434.8, GB9805045.3 and GB9706427.3, PCT/GB99/00624 and PCT/GB98/00803 and EP98913892.0
Hearing Officer
Mr P E Redding
Decision date
24 May 2002
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Howard Anthony Quinn v Decalite Limited & David Pearson
Provisions discussed
PA.1977 sections 8, 12 & 13
Keywords
Entitlement, Inventorship, Orders, Withdrawal
Related Decisions
None

Summary

Following withdrawal of a reference under sections 8(1)(a) and 12(1)(a) and an application under sections 13(1) and 13(3), the parties requested an order be made out that the patent applications should proceed in the name of [the opponent] to 'record that the entitlement claims by [the referrer] have been formally concluded by consent'.

An appropriate order was made.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o22202.html