BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> I.D.A. Limited and others v University of Southampton (Patent) [2002] UKIntelP o44402 (30 October 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o44402.html
Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o44402

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


I.D.A. Limited and others v University of Southampton [2002] UKIntelP o44402 (30 October 2002)

For the whole decision click here: o44402

Patent decision

BL number
O/444/02
Concerning rights in
GB 9814507.1; PCT/GB99/02090; EP 99929525.6; Australia 4631799
Hearing Officer
Mr R C Kennell
Decision date
30 October 2002
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
I.D.A. Limited and others v University of Southampton
Provisions discussed
PR 1995 rule 94(1)
Keywords
Orders
Related Decisions
[2002] UKIntelP o06702

Summary

Second preliminary decision

Although minded to withdraw existing confidentiality directions on parts of the defendants evidence, for which they said they were under obligations of confidentiality to a third party, the hearing officer gave the defendants a period of 7 days to comment before making any further order. The hearing officer proposed to take no action in respect of the defendants allegation that the claimants had breached the existing directions.

The claimants had originally requested confidentiality for the whole of their evidence in reply, but, following correspondence and with the agreement of the parties, the hearing officer directed confidentiality for a very small part only of the evidence. The hearing officer also gave a period of 7 days for comments before laying another part open to public inspection, some at least of which already appeared to be in the public domain.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o44402.html