BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> CUSTOMER FIRST (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2006] UKIntelP o04806 (14 February 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o04806.html
Cite as: [2006] UKIntelP o4806, [2006] UKIntelP o04806

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


CUSTOMER FIRST (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2006] UKIntelP o04806 (14 February 2006)

For the whole decision click here: o04806

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/048/06
Decision date
14 February 2006
Hearing officer
Mr D Landau
Mark
CUSTOMER FIRST
Classes
35
Applicant
Devon County Council
Opponent
Customer First (UK) Limited
Opposition
Section 5(2)(b)

Result

Section 5(2)(b): - Opposition failed.

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opponent in these proceedings owned a series of two certification trade marks in Classes 16, 35, 36, 41 and 42 comprising a device element with the words "putting the Customer First". The latter two words being more prominent than the first two and one mark was limited to a specific colour but this did not impact on the Hearing Officer’s decision. In these proceedings the applicant’s mark is also a Certification Trade Mark.

Both sides filed written submissions for the Hearing Officer's consideration but the opponent also filed evidence by way of extracts from the Internet to support its claim that the words "Customer First" are in the public domain and that no one party could claim a monopoly in such words.

Under Section 5(2)(b) the Hearing Officer determined that identical services were at issue but this did not assist the opponent since the Hearing Officer accepted that the words "Customer First" or "putting the Customer First" were totally descriptive and he had to take this into account in comparing the respective marks. As the device elements in the respective marks were not similar the Hearing Officer decided that the opposition must fail



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o04806.html