BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> FOREVER YOUNG (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2006] UKIntelP o10706 (13 April 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o10706.html
Cite as: [2006] UKIntelP o10706

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


FOREVER YOUNG (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2006] UKIntelP o10706 (13 April 2006)

For the whole decision click here: o10706

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/107/06
Decision date
13 April 2006
Hearing officer
Mr M Reynolds
Mark
FOREVER YOUNG
Classes
05, 32
Registered Proprietor
Natures Choice Limited
Applicants for Revocation
T.T.I. Participations SA
Application for Revocation
Sections 46(1)(a) & 46(1)(b)

Result

Application for revocation partially successful.

Points Of Interest

Summary

The Hearing Officer accepted that the use shown in the evidence was genuine use. The issues for determination were the nature of the goods in respect of which the mark had been used and how those goods should fairly be described. The mark was registered in Class 5 for “Dietary and dietary food preparations and supplements; all containing extracts from the aloe vera plant” and in Class 32 in respect of “Mineral and aerate waters and other non-alcoholic drinks; syrups and other preparations for making beverages; all containing extracts from the aloe vera plant.

In the result, the Hearing Officer decided that the specification should be reduced to “juices all containing extracts from the aloe vera plant” (Class 32). The Class 5 specification was revoked.

The award of costs to the applicants was reduced to reflect their partial success and the time lost due to their inactivity in dealing with a settlement proposal.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o10706.html