BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> MAYBELLE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2006] UKIntelP o16806 (20 June 2006) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o16806.html Cite as: [2006] UKIntelP o16806 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o16806
Result
Section 5(2)(b): Opposition failed.
Points Of Interest
Summary
The opponent based its opposition on its ownership of a registration in Classes 5 and 29 for the mark MARIBEL. In particular the registration in Class 29 covered a range of identical and similar goods as those of the application in suit but its statement of use referred only to “Jams, marmalade, honey and cherries”. The evidence provided in support of the opposition showed significant user from 1994 onwards in respect of the list of goods mentioned above but the use in respect of “cherries” was not well proved and the Hearing Officer declined to include those goods in his consideration.
Under Section 5(2)(b) the Hearing Officer accepted that the opponent’s mark was distinctive but did not think the user enhanced that distinctiveness. However, he considered the respective goods similar and went on to compare the respective marks MAYBELLE and MARIBEL. While the two marks shared the same two letters MA and both contained the letters BEL the Hearing Officer thought the marks both visually and phonetically different and he did not think they would be confused by the public. Opposition failed.
