BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Cartoon devices in the shape of gas cylinders (series of 2 marks) (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2007] UKIntelP o11007 (20 April 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o11007.html
Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o11007

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Cartoon devices in the shape of gas cylinders (series of 2 marks) (Trade Mark: Revocation) [2007] UKIntelP o11007 (20 April 2007)

For the whole decision click here: o11007

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/110/07
Decision date
20 April 2007
Hearing officer
Mr G Salthouse
Mark
Cartoon devices in the shape of gas cylinders (series of 2 marks)
Classes
04
Applicant for Revocation
Calor Gas Northern Ireland Ltd
Registered Proprietor
Flo-Gas Limited
Revocation
Section 46(1)(b)

Result

Section 46(1)(b): Revocation successful.

Points Of Interest

Summary

The applicant for revocation applied on 18 January 2006 and claimed that there had been no use of the marks in suit in the five year period ending on 23 March 2005 and also the five year period ending on 18 January 2006.

The registered proprietor filed leaflets and advertising literature and claimed these had been issued in relation to its products and dating back to 2003. The leaflets were all undated. The applicant filed the results of investigations which it claimed, showed that there had been no use of the marks in suit.

The Hearing Officer considered the registered proprietor’s evidence. He decided that the cartoon characters as used on the advertising and other leaflets were not the same as the marks as registered. Thus in his view there was no use of the marks as registered. In any event even if the marks in the leaflets were acceptable, all the material was undated and there was no supporting documentation to prove that there had been genuine use of the marks in suit. Revocation thus successful and granted with effect from 23 March 2005.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o11007.html