BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> WILD GEESE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2008] UKIntelP o18008 (27 June 2008)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2008/o18008.html
Cite as: [2008] UKIntelP o18008

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

WILD GEESE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2008] UKIntelP o18008 (27 June 2008)

For the whole decision click here: o18008

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/180/08
Decision date
27 June 2008
Hearing officer
Professor Ruth Annand
Mark
WILD GEESE
Classes
25, 32, 33
Applicant
Lodestar Anstalt
Opponent
Austin Nicholas & Co Incorporated DBA Pernod Rickard USA
Opposition
Sections 5(2(b), 5(3) & 5(4)(a)

Points Of Interest

Summary

In his decision dated 17 October 2007 (BL O/306/07) the Hearing Officer found that the opposition failed on all grounds. Subsequently the opponent appealed to the Appointed Person and the case was set down for hearing. The opponent asked for an adjournment and then withdrew its appeal. The applicant asked for costs.

The Appointed Person asked the applicant to itemise its costs and this was provided. The opponent declined to comment on the costs claim. The claim was for a total of £740 and the Appointed Person decided to make an award of £600.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2008/o18008.html