BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Combi Corporation (Patent) [2011] UKIntelP o43111 (1 December 2011)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2011/o43111.html
Cite as: [2011] UKIntelP o43111

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Combi Corporation [2011] UKIntelP o43111 (1 December 2011)

For the whole decision click here: o43111

Patent decision

BL number
O/431/11
Concerning rights in
GB1102027.8
Hearing Officer
Mr B Micklewright
Decision date
1 December 2011
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Combi Corporation
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977, section 1(1)(b) and 3
Keywords
Inventive step
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention related to a baby carrier with a chest strap which included a cover. The cover had an indicated to indicate a back side surface from a front side surface so that in use the user could check that the strap was not twisted. The examiner cited three prior art documents, two relating to baby carriers with chest straps with covers and the third relating to an infant’s vehicle restraint strap which included a cover with a buckle guard. The hearing officer found that this buckle guard could serve as an indicator but nevertheless it would not be obvious to the person skilled in the art to combine the teaching of this document with the teaching of either of the first two documents. He therefore concluded that the application may be forwarded for grant.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2011/o43111.html