BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o30112 (6 August 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o30112.html
Cite as: [2012] UKIntelP o30112

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o30112 (6 August 2012)

Patent decision

BL number
O/301/12
Concerning rights in
GB1001438.9
Hearing Officer
Dr J E Porter
Decision date
6 August 2012
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Company Limited
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977 Section 1(2)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention concerns language-based interaction with a virtual pet. It involves processing natural language input from a user and obtaining the user’s language characteristics from a database. These characteristics are adjusted in light of the processed input, with the result that the virtual pet keeps learning the language characteristics of the user, and employs language in its responses which embodies those characteristics.

The hearing officer followed the steps set out in Aerotel in order to determine whether the invention was excluded from patentability. Having rejected arguments that the contribution lay in a new system or new configuration of hardware and software, he found that the contribution lay in software which provided better user interaction with a virtual entity, by enabling the continuous learning of the language characteristics of the user and by generating responses to the user which reflected those language characteristics. Having considered the AT&T/CVON signposts, he found that this was not a contribution that was technical in nature. The application was refused.


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o30112


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o30112.html