BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Watermist Limited and Protec Fire Detection Limited (Patent) [2013] UKIntelP o47313 (26 November 2013) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2013/o47313.html Cite as: [2013] UKIntelP o47313 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Summary
The patentee requested a review of Opinion 4/13 on the grounds that the examiner had misconstrued the claims and wrongly concluded that there was no infringement. The patent relates to fire fighting units and the invention is concerned with an arrangement of hose reel, pump and nozzle placed in a cabinet having a hinged door. The Hearing Officer found that the examiner had not misconstrued the meaning of the claims or misunderstood the relevance of the evidence, and had not reached a conclusion that was clearly wrong. The examiner had not considered the question of indirect infringement because he was not asked to do so. The Opinion was not set aside.
