BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Peter Robert Goodall (Patent) [2015] UKIntelP o11315 (16 March 2015)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2015/o11315.html
Cite as: [2015] UKIntelP o11315

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Peter Robert Goodall (Patent) [2015] UKIntelP o11315 (16 March 2015)

Patent decision

BL number
O/113/15
Concerning rights in
GB1012359.4
Hearing Officer
Mr S Brown
Decision date
16 March 2015
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Peter Robert Goodall
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 Section 18(3)
Keywords
Extensions of time
Related Decisions
None

Summary

On 25 January 2011 a combined search and examination report was issued raising a number of substantive issues and setting a response date of 23 July 2012. The applicant did not reply until 24 December 2014 when he requested that he be allowed to file a late response. The examiner refused.

At the hearing the applicant provided a written timeline explaining his circumstances between January 2012 and the end of December 2014. He also provided additional information and detail orally. The hearing officer accepted that this showed that the applicant had experienced a series of unfortunate and unusual events spanning the vast majority of the period of time from before the specified response date to the present day. The hearing officer also accepted that the applicant's reasons for responding late were peculiar to him and his application and that they were sufficient in terms of severity and extent to justify the exercise of discretion in this case. The hearing officer thus decided to allow a late response.

The hearing officer gave the applicant one month to file his response to the examination report. If he does not do so within this time then the application will be refused under section 18(3).


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o11315


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2015/o11315.html