BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Waterco Limited, Pradeep Kumar Tandon and Kenneth Cleine (Patent) [2015] UKIntelP o15415 (8 April 2015)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2015/o15415.html
Cite as: [2015] UKIntelP o15415

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Waterco Limited, Pradeep Kumar Tandon and Kenneth Cleine (Patent) [2015] UKIntelP o15415 (8 April 2015)

Patent decision

BL number
O/154/15
Concerning rights in
EP2170522
Hearing Officer
Mrs S Eaves
Decision date
8 April 2015
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Waterco Limited, Pradeep Kumar Tandon and Kenneth Cleine
Provisions discussed
PA Act 1977 Section 13(1)
Keywords
Inventorship
Related Decisions
None

Summary

An application under rule 10(2) of the Patent Rules 2007 was filed by Waterco Limited to mention Kenneth Cleine as a joint inventor along with Pradeep Kumar Tandon. Pradeep Kumar Tandon and Kenneth Cleine subsequently filed written consent in support of the application. As such, the comptroller considered the application to be unopposed and found that Kenneth Cleine should be mentioned as a joint inventor along with Pradeep Kumar Tandon in the granted patent for the invention and directed that an addendum slip mentioning Kenneth Cleine as a joint inventor be prepared for the granted patent for the invention.


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o15415


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2015/o15415.html