BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Moore & Anor (t/a John Moore Event) (Furniture) Hire [2010] UKUT 27 (AAC) (26 January 2010) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2010/27.html Cite as: [2010] UKUT 27 (AAC) |
||
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER APPEALS
ON APPEAL from the DECISION of
Richard Turfitt Traffic Commissioner for the
Eastern Traffic Area dated 6 November 2009
Before:
Hugh Carlisle QC Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Stuart James Member of the Upper Tribunal
John Robinson Member of the Upper Tribunal
Appellant:
JOHN & SHANE MOORE
(t/a JOHN MOORE EVENT (FURNITURE) HIRE
Attendances:
For the Appellants: No-one appeared
Heard at: Victory House, 30-34 Kingsway, London
Date of hearing: 12 January 2010
Date of decision: 26 January 2010
DECISION OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal be DISMISSED.
1. This was an appeal against the decision of the Traffic Commissioner for the Eastern Traffic Area on 6 November 2009 when he refused to find exceptional circumstances under s.45(5) of the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995 so as to disregard the termination of the licence by non-payment of the renewal fee.
2. The factual background appears from the documents and is as follows:
(i) Since 2002 the Appellants have been the holder of an operator’s licence authorising one vehicle. They elected to pay the licence fee annually, with the relevant date being 31 August.
(ii) On 30 July 2009 the Appellants were sent a reminder that payment of the fee (£14) was due on 31 August 2009. It was pointed out that failure to pay would result in automatic termination of the licence. No payment was received and on 21 September the Traffic Area Office informed the Appellants that their licence had terminated. In the meantime Mr John Moore wrote in on 17 September and stated that they had been very busy and had forgotten about the licence. He had telephoned the Traffic Area Office when he had remembered and had been told to write in with an explanation. A second letter on 24 September was to similar effect. Renewal had completely slipped his mind: he said that he could have blamed the failure on the post office but had not tried to do so.
(iii) On 6 November 2009 the Traffic Commissioner considered the papers and decided that there were no exceptional circumstances so as to enable him to direct that the termination be disregarded.
(iv) On 16 November 2009 Mr Moore sent a notice of appeal to the Tribunal. He accepted that he had been at fault. He had put the reminder to one side and had forgotten about it. He realised that it had not been dealt with on 13 September and immediately posted the renewal notice with a cheque. It was a genuine oversight. He said that having to apply for a new licence would be a heavy burden financially.
3. The Appellants did not appear on the hearing of the appeal and requested the Tribunal to deal with it in their absence.
4. We have carefully considered the papers and have to say that the Traffic Commissioner’s decision cannot be faulted. Forgetfulness does not constitute “exceptional circumstances” and accordingly he was unable to disregard the termination. We agree with his decision. The appeal is dismissed.
Hugh Carlisle QC
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
26 January 2010
