BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> HM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (II) (Industrial injuries benefits - other) [2017] UKUT 216 (AAC) (19 May 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/216.html Cite as: [2017] UKUT 216 (AAC) |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
HM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (II) (Industrial injuries benefits - other) [2017] UKUT 216 (AAC) (19 May 2017)
A decision of the First-tier Tribunal in the Social Entitlement Chamber is not to be characterised as final until a written copy of it (usually a decision notice) is sent to the parties. If a party submits further evidence after a hearing but before the making or issuing of a decision, the tribunal is not simply debarred from taking it into account because the hearing has been concluded. Rather, it has a discretion which it must exercise properly and in accordance with the overriding objective. However, given the tribunal’s normal practice of deciding appeals on the day of the hearing the situation will only arise infrequently.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 216.pdf
