ED v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Claims and payments - other, Recovery of overpayments - misrepresentation, Revisions, supersessions and reviews - ignorance of material fact) [2020] UKUT 352 (AAC) (15 December 2020)

BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> ED v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Claims and payments - other, Recovery of overpayments - misrepresentation, Revisions, supersessions and reviews - ignorance of material fact) [2020] UKUT 352 (AAC) (15 December 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/352.html
Cite as: [2020] UKUT 352 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

ED v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2020] UKUT 352 (AAC) (15 December 2020)

The appellant had - in a fictitious identity that was not that of another, real, person - claimed and been granted asylum, indefinite leave to remain and British citizenship. The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions accepted that the appellant was not "a person subject to immigration control" within the meaning of section 115 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, and that the appellant was not therefore, by section 115(1) and (3) of that act, disentitled to benefits. This acceptance was given in view of (i) the concession in R (Kaziu, Hysaj and Bakijasi) v SSHD [2015] EWCA Civ 1195, [2016] 1 WLR 673, and (ii) R (Hysaj and Bakijasi) v SSHD [2017] UKSC 82, [2018] 1 WLR 221. But the Jobseeker's Allowance (IB), Income Support and Employment and Support Allowance (IR) awards were nonetheless lawfully reversed, not because the appellant was "a person subject to immigration control" - which she wasn't - but because the benefits claims did not satisfy the requirements of section 1 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 352 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/352.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> ED v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Claims and payments - other, Recovery of overpayments - misrepresentation, Revisions, supersessions and reviews - ignorance of material fact) [2020] UKUT 352 (AAC) (15 December 2020) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/352.html Cite as: [2020] UKUT 352 (AAC)