BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Information Commissioner v Dr Gary Spiers and Garstang Medical Practice (Information rights - Information rights: practice and procedure - tribunal membership and procedure) [2022] UKUT 93 (AAC) (24 March 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2022/93.html
Cite as: [2022] UKUT 93 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Information Commissioner v Dr Gary Spiers and Garstang Medical Practice [2022] UKUT 93 (AAC) (24 March 2022)


Whether application for certification for contempt under rule 7A of General Regulatory Chamber Rules is a separate set of proceedings from the appeal proceedings from which the contempt application arises – whether First-tier Tribunal erred in law in joining the Information Commissioner to the rule 7A contempt proceedings where he did not consent to being joined and where his interests were not affected by the contempt proceedings.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2022] UKUT 93 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2022/93.html