BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) >> Revenue and Customs v Sippchoice Ltd (INCOME : scheme sanction charges) [2017] UKUT 87 (TCC) (1 March 2017)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/TCC/2017/87.html
Cite as: [2017] UKUT 87 (TCC), [2017] Pens LR 10, [2017] STC 1580, [2017] BTC 510

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]



Revenue and Customs v Sippchoice Ltd (INCOME ) [2017] UKUT 87 (TCC) (1 March 2017)


INCOME TAX – scheme sanction charges – FA 2009 s 269 – whether scheme administrator reasonably believed that no unauthorised payment was being made – s 268(7)(a) – whether FTT erred in its interpretation and application of the test of reasonableness – Mobilx considered – whether FTT made an error of law in its findings of fact – Edwards v Bairstow

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 87.pdf


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/TCC/2017/87.html