BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) >> Revenue and Customs v Rogers & Anor [2019] UKUT 406 (TCC) (30 December 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/TCC/2019/406.html Cite as: [2019] UKUT 406 (TCC), [2020] 4 WLR 23, [2020] WLR(D) 15 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [View ICLR summary: [2020] WLR(D) 15] [Buy ICLR report: [2020] 4 WLR 23] [Help]
Revenue and Customs v Nigel Rogers and Craig Shaw: [2019] UKUT 406 (TCC) (30 December 2019)
INCOME TAX - Penalties for late filing - Whether notice to file had to be issued by identified "flesh and blood" officer - no - whether Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider validity of notice to file in penalty appeal - yes - whether procedural unfairness in FTT taking a point without inviting submissions - yes - appeal allowed and decision remade.
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2019] UKUT 406 (TCC)
