BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> AT Installations Ltd v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V18998 (22 March 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V18998.html Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V18998 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
A T Installations Ltd v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V18998 (22 March 2005)
18998
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/2004/0708
A T INSTALLATIONS LTD Appellant
and
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal: Michael Johnson (Chairman)
Sitting in public in Manchester on 1 March 2005
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to the imposition of a default surcharge and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 (as amended) ("the rules") coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Michael Clarke, director of the Appellant, for the Appellant and Richard Mansell, of the Solicitor's office of H M Customs and Excise, for the Respondents
And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to rule 30(8) of the rules that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the rules
This tribunal finds that the non-payment by the due date of the value added tax payable by the Appellant in respect of its accounting period 07/04 was attributable to an insufficiency of funds and that accordingly no reasonable excuse for the non-payment has been made out
And this tribunal accordingly directs that this appeal is dismissed.
MICHAEL JOHNSON
CHAIRMAN
RELEASE DATE: 22 March 2005
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005